Software Change Prediction: A Systematic Review and Future Guidelines

[1]    A.G. Koru and H. Liu, “Identifying and characterizing change-prone classes in two large-scale open-source products,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2007, pp. 63–73.

[2]    Y. Zhou, H. Leung, and B. Xu, “Examining the potentially confounding effect of class size on the associations between object-oriented metrics and change-proneness,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2009, pp. 607–623.

[3]    A.G. Koru and J. Tian, “Comparing high-change modules and modules with the highest measurement values in two large-scale open-source products,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 8, 2005, pp. 625–642.

[4]    E. Arisholm, L.C. Briand, and A. Foyen, “Dynamic coupling measurement for object-oriented software,” IEEE Transactions on software engineering, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2004, pp. 491–506.

[5]    B.A. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, and P. Brereton, Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews. CRC Press, 2015, Vol. 4.

[6]    R. Malhotra, M. Khanna, and R.R. Raje, “On the application of search-based techniques for software engineering predictive modeling: A systematic review and future directions,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 32, 2017, pp. 85–109.

[7]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “Threats to validity in search-based predictive modelling for software engineering,” IET Software, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2018, pp. 293–305.

[8]    D. Godara and R. Singh, “A review of studies on change proneness prediction in object oriented software,” International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 105, No. 3, 2014, pp. 35–41.

[9]    R. Malhotra and A.J. Bansal, “Software change prediction: A literature review,” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2016, pp. 240–256.

[10]    C. Catal and B. Diri, “A systematic review of software fault prediction studies,” Expert systems with applications, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2009, pp. 7346–7354.

[11]    T. Hall, S. Beecham, D. Bowes, D. Gray, and S. Counsell, “A systematic literature review on fault prediction performance in software engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1276–1304.

[12]    D. Radjenović, M. Heričko, R. Torkar, and A. Živkovič, “Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic literature review,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 55, No. 8, 2013, pp. 1397–1418.

[13]    R.S. Wahono, “A systematic literature review of software defect prediction: research trends, datasets, methods and frameworks,” Journal of Software Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–16.

[14]    S. Hosseini, B. Turhan, and D. Gunarathna, “A systematic literature review and meta-analysis on cross project defect prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2017, pp. 111–147.

[15]    R. Malhotra, “A systematic review of machine learning techniques for software fault prediction,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 27, 2015, pp. 504–518.

[16]    P.K. Singh, D. Agarwal, and A. Gupta, “A systematic review on software defect prediction,” in 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1793–1797.

[17]    C. Catal, “Software fault prediction: A literature review and current trends,” Expert systems with applications, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2011, pp. 4626–4636.

[18]    X. Zhu, Y. He, L. Cheng, X. Jia, and L. Zhu, “Software change-proneness prediction through combination of bagging and resampling methods,” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Vol. 30, No. 12, 2018, p. e2111.

[19]    G. Catolino and F. Ferrucci, “An extensive evaluation of ensemble techniques for software change prediction,” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 2019, p. e2156.

[20]    G. Catolino, F. Palomba, A. De Lucia, F. Ferrucci, and A. Zaidman, “Enhancing change prediction models using developer-related factors,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 143, 2018, pp. 14–28.

[21]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “Dynamic selection of fitness function for software change prediction using particle swarm optimization,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 112, 2019, pp. 51–67.

[22]    L. Kumar, S. Lal, A. Goyal, and N. Murthy, “Change-proneness of object-oriented software using combination of feature selection techniques and ensemble learning techniques,” in Proceedings of the 12th Innovations on Software Engineering Conference. ACM, 2019, p. 8.

[23]    Y. Ge, M. Chen, C. Liu, F. Chen, S. Huang, and H. Wang, “Deep metric learning for software change-proneness prediction,” in International Conference on Intelligent Science and Big Data Engineering. Springer, 2018, pp. 287–300.

[24]    H. Lu, Y. Zhou, B. Xu, H. Leung, and L. Chen, “The ability of object-oriented metrics to predict change-proneness: a meta-analysis,” Empirical software engineering, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2012, pp. 200–242.

[25]    M.O. Elish and M. Al-Rahman Al-Khiaty, “A suite of metrics for quantifying historical changes to predict future change-prone classes in object-oriented software,” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2013, pp. 407–437.

[26]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “An exploratory study for software change prediction in object-oriented systems using hybridized techniques,” Automated Software Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2017, pp. 673–717.

[27]    D. Romano and M. Pinzger, “Using source code metrics to predict change-prone java interfaces,” in 27th International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM). IEEE, 2011, pp. 303–312.

[28]    E. Giger, M. Pinzger, and H.C. Gall, “Can we predict types of code changes? An empirical analysis,” in 9th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). IEEE, 2012, pp. 217–226.

[29]    D. Azar and J. Vybihal, “An ant colony optimization algorithm to improve software quality prediction models: Case of class stability,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2011, pp. 388–393.

[30]    S. Karus and M. Dumas, “Code churn estimation using organisational and code metrics: An experimental comparison,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2012, pp. 203–211.

[31]    J.M. Bieman, G. Straw, H. Wang, P.W. Munger, and R.T. Alexander, “Design patterns and change proneness: An examination of five evolving systems,” in Proceedings. 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry (IEEE Cat. No. 03EX717). IEEE, 2004, pp. 40–49.

[32]    N. Zazworka, C. Izurieta, S. Wong, Y. Cai, C. Seaman, F. Shull et al., “Comparing four approaches for technical debt identification,” Software Quality Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2014, pp. 403–426.

[33]    X. Zhu, Q. Song, and Z. Sun, “Automated identification of change-prone classes in open source software projects.” Journal of Software, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2013, pp. 361–366.

[34]    M. Lindvall, “Are large C++ classes change-prone? An empirical investigation,” Software: Practice and Experience, Vol. 28, No. 15, 1998, pp. 1551–1558.

[35]    M. Lindvall, “Measurement of change: stable and change-prone constructs in a commercial C++ system,” in Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium. IEEE, 1999, pp. 40–49.

[36]    Y. Liu and T.M. Khoshgoftaar, “Genetic programming model for software quality classification,” in Proceedings Sixth International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering. Special Topic: Impact of Networking. IEEE, 2001, pp. 127–136.

[37]    M. Al-Khiaty, R. Abdel-Aal, and M.O. Elish, “Abductive network ensembles for improved prediction of future change-prone classes in object-oriented software.” International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2017, pp. 803–811.

[38]    T.M. Khoshgoftaar, N. Seliya, and Y. Liu, “Genetic programming-based decision trees for software quality classification,” in 15th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. IEEE, 2003, pp. 374–383.

[39]    L. Kumar, S.K. Rath, and A. Sureka, “Empirical analysis on effectiveness of source code metrics for predicting change-proneness,” in 10th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference. ACM, 2017, pp. 4–14.

[40]    N. Tsantalis, A. Chatzigeorgiou, and G. Stephanides, “Predicting the probability of change in object-oriented systems,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 7, 2005, pp. 601–614.

[41]    L. Kumar, S.K. Rath, and A. Sureka, “Using source code metrics to predict change-prone web services: A case-study on ebay services,” in Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–7.

[42]    A.R. Sharafat and L. Tahvildari, “Change prediction in object-oriented software systems: A probabilistic approach,” Journal of Software, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2008, pp. 26–39.

[43]    L. Kumar, R.K. Behera, S. Rath, and A. Sureka, “Transfer learning for cross-project change-proneness prediction in object-oriented software systems: A feasibility analysis,” ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2017, pp. 1–11.

[44]    D. Azar, “A genetic algorithm for improving accuracy of software quality predictive models: a search-based software engineering approach,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 9, No. 02, 2010, pp. 125–136.

[45]    R. Malhotra and R. Jangra, “Prediction and assessment of change prone classes using statistical and machine learning techniques,” Journal of Information Processing Systems, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2017, pp. 778–804.

[46]    A.R. Han, S.U. Jeon, D.H. Bae, and J.E. Hong, “Measuring behavioral dependency for improving change-proneness prediction in uml-based design models,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 83, No. 2, 2010, pp. 222–234.

[47]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “An empirical study for software change prediction using imbalanced data,” Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2017, pp. 2806–2851.

[48]    S. Eski and F. Buzluca, “An empirical study on object-oriented metrics and software evolution in order to reduce testing costs by predicting change-prone classes,” in Fourth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops. IEEE, 2011, pp. 566–571.

[49]    M. Yan, X. Zhang, C. Liu, L. Xu, M. Yang, and D. Yang, “Automated change-prone class prediction on unlabeled dataset using unsupervised method,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 92, 2017, pp. 1–16.

[50]    A. Agrawal and R.K. Singh, “Empirical validation of OO metrics and machine learning algorithms for software change proneness prediction,” in Towards Extensible and Adaptable Methods in Computing. Springer, 2018, pp. 69–84.

[51]    C. Liu, Y. Dan, X. Xin, Y. Meng, and Z. Xiaohong, “Cross-project change-proneness prediction,” in 42nd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 64–73.

[52]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “Investigation of relationship between object-oriented metrics and change proneness,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2013, pp. 273–286.

[53]    L. Kaur and M. Ashutosh, “A comparative analysis of evolutionary algorithms for the prediction of software change,” in International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT). IEEE, 2018, pp. 188–192.

[54]    R. Malhotra and A.J. Bansal, “Cross project change prediction using open source projects,” in International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE, 2014, pp. 201–207.

[55]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “Prediction of change prone classes using evolution-based and object-oriented metrics,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2018, pp. 1755–1766.

[56]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “A new metric for predicting software change using gene expression programming,” in 5th International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics. ACM, 2014, pp. 8–14.

[57]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “Particle swarm optimization-based ensemble learning for software change prediction,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 102, 2018, pp. 65–84.

[58]    C. Marinescu, “How good is genetic programming at predicting changes and defects?” in 16th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC). IEEE, 2014, pp. 544–548.

[59]    M.O. Elish, H. Aljamaan, and I. Ahmad, “Three empirical studies on predicting software maintainability using ensemble methods,” Soft Computing, Vol. 19, No. 9, 2015, pp. 2511–2524.

[60]    R. Malhotra and M. Khanna, “Mining the impact of object oriented metrics for change prediction using machine learning and search-based techniques,” in International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE, 2015, pp. 228–234.

[61]    A. Bansal, “Empirical analysis of search based algorithms to identify change prone classes of open source software,” Computer Languages, Systems and Structures, Vol. 47, 2017, pp. 211–231.

[62]    S.R. Chidamber and C.F. Kemerer, “A metrics suite for object oriented design,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1994, pp. 476–493.

[63]    J. Bansiya and C.G. Davis, “A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2002, pp. 4–17.

[64]    M. Lorenz and J. Kidd, Object-oriented software metrics: A practical guide. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994.

[65]    W. Li and S. Henry, “Object-oriented metrics that predict maintainability,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1993, pp. 111–122.

[66]    K. Gao, T.M. Khoshgoftaar, and A. Napolitano, “Combining feature subset selection and data sampling for coping with highly imbalanced software data,” in Software Engineering Knowledge Engineering Conference, 2015, pp. 439–444.

[67]    H. He and E.A. Garcia, “Learning from imbalanced data,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1263–1284.

[68]    C.G. Weng and J. Poon, “A new evaluation measure for imbalanced datasets,” in 7th Australian Data Mining Conference. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2008, pp. 27–32.

[69]    M.A. De Almeida and S. Matwin, “Machine learning method for software quality model building,” in International symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems. Springer, 1999, pp. 565–573.

[70]    R. Malhotra, Empirical research in software engineering: Concepts, analysis and applications. CRC Press, 2016.

[71]    W. Afzal and R. Torkar, “On the application of genetic programming for software engineering predictive modeling: A systematic review,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2011, pp. 11984–11997.

[72]    J. Wen, S. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Hu, and C. Huang, “Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2012, pp. 41–59.